Having drafted the defining moment essay and having been graded on that draft, you will do three things with the paprer in the next stage of the development process, which I call the Errors Analysis project. For the Errors Analysis project, 1) you will edit and revise the papers to make them perfect. 2) You will write an analysis, in your own words--not quoted verbatim, of the editing errors in your paper. 3.) You will turn in the revision for my (re)evaluation.
Youíll turn in hard copy of three things--the graded papers which I have already marked, the corrected and revised copy of the essay, and the errors analysis document. This is the process.
6a. Do not copy or explain verbatim from a handbook why you have made a correction. I want you to explain the corrections in your own words so that it is clear to me that you understand what the problem is and how to correct it.
6b. Do not simply describe what change you have made; Iíll be able to see that in the final draft. For example, "I forgot to put in a comma," doesnít show that you know why the comma was needed. "Commas should separate a series of modifiers," shows that you understand that convention for use of commas. The errors analysis can be tedious and repetitive, but that is good. Repetition reinforces understanding, and you donít want me to have to keep marking the same editing errors in the rest of your essays this semester because you will not like your grades if I don't see improvements.
6c. If itís not clear to me that you understand what the errors are, how to fix them and, therefore, how to avoid them hereafter, you wonít recieve credit for the errors analysis assignment. Pretty tough, huh? The errors analysis is an important way to learn how to avoid repeting the same errors in subsequent papers, so be conscientious and do it well.
Return to English 111 main menu
Return to R. Dollieslager's home page